Painting Women from Judges – Part 1: Jephthah’s Reflective Daughter

This post was originally composed for and published on Feminism and Religion,

The story of Jephthah’s daughter – found in the Hebrew Bible, Judges 11:29-40 – is a difficult story to read. The first time I read it, I was in my Christian high school Bible class and I could not understand why our teacher did not address the violence done by a father to his daughter. In my experience, Christians dismiss much of the violence done to women in the Hebrew Bible as evidence that ancient fathers, brothers, and husbands really did not care for their daughters, sisters, and wives. Since today men love the women in their lives, the ancient problem is no longer an issue, and we can continue with more pressing issues – or so the unspoken logic goes.

However, some feminist scholars – such as myself and Dr. Tammi Schnider – argue that it was common for fathers to love their daughters in the Hebrew Bible, and Jephthah is no exception. His daughter is his only relative in the text, and presumably the only person impatiently waiting for him to return from the war he led. Yet, because of the vow he makes to the deity – a vow the deity does not request or acknowledge – he sacrifices his only loved one. Why would he make such a vow? Why would his daughter go along with it? These are two of the questions I could not help but yell as I struggled with the text.

My interpretation of Jephthah’s daughter was inspired by a fellow student, Mariam Youssef. She presented three key aspects of modern rape culture that further victimize subjects of violence: victimization of the perpetrator, ambiguity in the retelling of the violent action(s), and cooperation of the victim. Youssef then showed how these aspects fit the biblical story of violence (despite the lack of rape). I found this insight very helpful and incorporated each into my painting.

Jephthah’s reaction to his daughter’s celebratory exit of her house is one that shifts the blame from him to her. Instead of becoming upset that he made a rash vow that resulted in such a devastating situation, he blames her for unknowingly fulfilling his vow (11:29-30). The shift of blame from father to daughter happens in one concise verbal expression, “Alas, my daughter! You have brought me very low; you have become the cause of great trouble to me. For I have opened my mouth to the Lord, and I cannot take back my vow,” (11:35). He portrays his daughter as the reason for him being brought low. According to Jephthah, she is now the perpetrator and he the victim. To highlight the shift in blame, Jephthah’s daughter is falling to her knees in my painting; she is the one brought low, she is the victim.

Jaepeth's Daughter

The biblical text does not address Jephthah’s sacrifice of his daughter; instead it says that she came down from the mountains after the two months of mourning her virginity and that Jephthah did as he had vowed (11:39). This gives the strong impression that she was indeed sacrificed. Excluding important details or using ambiguous language to describe an act of violence de-emphasizes the horror of the action and dehumanizes the victim. Since I wanted to express other aspects of Jephthah’s daughter’s experience, I seemingly participate in this ambiguity. Nevertheless, I hope it is clear in the context of the other women in this set of paintings that violence is imminent (see future parts). While the text is not addressing the horror of the violence, my painting is by emphasizing the personhood of the woman prior to her terrible and completely unnecessary death.

The last aspect of modern rape culture Youssef addressed was the cooperation of the victim. This is the most devastating part of the story for me. Witnessing the biblical account of Jephthah’s daughter’s acceptance of her abusive relationship – and the loss of self that would result – is heart breaking. Not only does she respond to her father’s blame shift with an acknowledgement of his right to complete his vow (11:36), but she also returns from her mountain experience so that he could complete his vow (11:39)! My experience of compliance in a past abusive relationship resulted in self-examination and eventual awareness of how toxic my situation was. It is for this reason that I painted Jephthah’s daughter with her hands out in front of her. Her face is downcast because of the weight she bears, but also because of the introspection she is experiencing.

Since the text does not detail Jephthah’s daughter’s thoughts, feelings, or motivations, I imagined them for the sake of my painting. In my interpretation, Jephthah’s daughter is aware of the toxicity of her situation. But she continues to stumble to her home for a reason unknown to the biblical text, interpreters of the text, and viewers of my painting – she appears to be enabling the violence. In my painting, this is the reason she does not fight back against the box surrounding her, which represents any and all aspects of the biblical text and interpretation that has limited her.

The box surrounding Jephthah’s daughter is blue, green, and dark magenta. Each box includes blue because in this set of paintings, I chose blue to represent patriarchal forces. For this box however, blue also represents the mountains and freedom denied Jephthah’s daughter. Green represents the grass I envision Jephthah’s daughter dancing in with her fellow maidens (11:37) and her growing vibrant life, both of which were taken from her. And magenta is for the blood Jephthah spilled both on the battlefield and at home.

If we are to read this text seriously, how does it affect the way we understand a deity who saved Isaac from a very similar situation in Genesis? How does this affect the way we read other biblical narratives like the metaphors of battered women in Ezekiel? And, most importantly, how does it affect the way we react to violence against women today?



  1. “a vow the deity does not request or acknowledge”
    good point!

    I can’t help but wonder if the deity in the book of Genesis was even the same god as Jephthah’s deity.. I believe Jephthah created a powerful deity in his own mind, put faith/energy into his diety, which in turn gave him the power/ confidence to survive the war. If he came to realize himself as the true creator of his own destiny at this point, he would have been able to avoid this senseless act of violence altogether.

    it seems to me as if the bible was filled with the stories of a very Schizophrenic fierce diety


    1. Very thoughtful and thought-provoking. In the text, it is clear that Jephthah knows Isrealite history, however he is outcast from his tribe (before the war) so maybe he doesn’t even follow YHWH/El, or at least not the version of the deity his tribe follows. Something to chew on for sure.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s